<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>U.S. immigration lawyers serving individual and corporate clients in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area and nationwide.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cilawgroup.com/topics/i-9/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cilawgroup.com</link>
	<description>Immigration Attorneys and Counselors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:35:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. immigration lawyers serving individual and corporate clients in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area and nationwide.</title>
		<link>http://www.cilawgroup.com/news/2010/02/11/dhs-reports-on-employer-enforcement-and-compliance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cilawgroup.com/news/2010/02/11/dhs-reports-on-employer-enforcement-and-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5 million]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirmation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of homeland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS Secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeland security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration and customs enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[queries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symposium]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cilawgroup.com/news/2010/02/11/dhs-reports-on-employer-enforcement-and-compliance/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in a recent symposium, has provides some useful insight into its operations and policies.  We are happy to share some of DHS&#8217;s disclosures.</p>
<p><strong>DHS Investigations on Employers to Continue and Increase</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.cilawgroup.com/news/2010/02/11/dhs-reports-on-employer-enforcement-and-compliance/" class="more-link">Read more on DHS Reports on Employer Enforcement and Compliance&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in a recent symposium, has provides some useful insight into its operations and policies.  We are happy to share some of DHS&#8217;s disclosures.</p>
<p><strong>DHS Investigations on Employers to Continue and Increase</strong></p>
<p>Janet Napolitano, the DHS Secretary, has indicated that employer investigations will continue and, possibly, intensify.  In 2009 there were $24 million in employer fines (compared to zero in 2006).  In 2009, 45 businesses and 47 individuals have been debarred while in 2008 only one was debarred.  Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has issued  over 1,000 I-9 Notice of Inspection (NOI) in 2009 to random employers with another 1,000 announced at the symposium.   I-9 audits, many of which are conducted randomly, may result in civil penalties, and where bad faith is found, lead to criminal prosecution.</p>
<p>DHS has clarified that it would continue under a two-prong approach:  (1) prosecute employers acting in bad faith and (2) work with employers to achieve compliance.</p>
<p><strong>E-Verify Updates</strong></p>
<p>DHS announced that there are more than 170,000 employers in the E-Verify system.  In 2008, there were 8.5 million queries run on new hires.  96.9% of those new hires were authorized by E-Verify within 24 hours; 2.8% are found to be ineligible to work; and 0.3% received tentative non-confirmation but were later confirmed as authorized to work.</p>
<p>DHS announced that the photo tool will be soon made available to designated agents, as well as to employers. The photo tool should also be expanded to include passport photos of U.S. citizens.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">E-Verify Usage Issues</span>.  DHS noted several E-Verify usage issues, as reported by a third party engaged to analyze E-Verify usage.</p>
<ul>
<li>It was reported that 16% of the E-Verify employers did not complete the tutorial &#8211; which can indicate, according to DHS, sharing of passwords by employers or insufficient training;</li>
<li>16% of the E-Verify employers use the system as a pre-screen, which is a violation of the E-Verify and can be prosecuted;</li>
<li>20% of employers took adverse action against prospective employees who received a tentative non-confirmation, again, in violation of E-Verify rules;</li>
<li>9% of employers received a tentative non-confirmation but failed to give notice to the employee of the election to contest.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>FAR</strong></p>
<p>Over 18,000 federal contractors are now enrolled in E-Verify following <a href="http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/09/federal-contractors-required-to-use-e-verify-beginning-september-8-2009/">rules requiring such participation</a>.  9,000 federal contractors have the FAR clause inserted in the federal contracts.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>In light of these updates on DHS policies, it is clear that DHS will sharpen its focus on employers and require proper E-Verify participation (for E-Verify employers) and good Form I-9 compliance practices.  The increasing audits, fines and, in some cases, debarments, should serve as a notice to employers to create and follow proper employment authorization and immigration compliance programs.    Please contact us if we can help you evaluate and modify your programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cilawgroup.com/news/2010/02/11/dhs-reports-on-employer-enforcement-and-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

