USCIS Issues a Multitude of RFEs on Pending I-485 Applications

Many of our clients and readers are already aware of the move by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (“USCIS”) to issue what are hundreds, or perhaps even thousands, of very similar, if not identical, requests for evidence (“RFE”) on pending employment-based primary Form I-485, Application to Adjust Status, cases (mostly for EB-2 India applicants).    Our office has been receiving such RFEs and we have been hearing from readers and clients who have also been affected by this large-scale RFE event.    We have seen similar RFE flood waves in the past and many EB-2 India applicants may have seen two or even three such RFEs.    Like previous RFE waves in the past, USCIS is generally seeking updated medicals, in addition to employment verification documents from the sponsoring employer.

Similar or Identical I-485 RFEs

In terms of substance, the RFEs appear to be almost identical and seek information and clarification on a few points – (1) evidence of continuous employment authorization in the U.S. from the date the I-485 application was filed to the date of the RFE; (2) a current (and original) employment verification letter from the original sponsoring employer or, in cases of AC21 porting to a new employer, from the new employer; and (3) request for updated I-693 medical exam form.   In few cases, we have also seen USCIS request updated Form G-325, Biographic Information.

Who Is Getting (Or Should Expect) I-485 RFE?

While there are many I-485 RFEs which are issued for other reasons, the trend we are noticing is that USCIS is issuing I-485 RFEs on pending I-485 applications filed by Indian nationals under the EB-2 preference category.   The reasons is that as many EB-2 India cutoff dates are advancing rapidly (6-8 months in most recent Visa Bulletins), USCIS is preparing I-485 applications with approaching priority dates for final review and approval when the priority date becomes current.

Expiring I-693 Medicals Triggers I-485 RFE

On June 1, 2014, USCIS amended its policy with respect to the continuing validity of the I-693, Medical Exam.   As a result of this change in policy, I-693 medical exams are valid for only one year and USCIS cannot approve a pending I-485 adjustment of status application without a valid I-693 medical exam.    As the cutoff dates for many employment-based categories advance, especially EB-2 India, USCIS adjudicators have to request an updated set of medical exam (from each I-485 applicant) in order to continue to keep the I-485 case preadjudicated and ready for approval once a visa number becomes available.

Many of our EB-2 India readers and clients have already experienced two, even three, such I-485 RFE “waves” and are generally not surprised or alarmed by the fact this kind of I-485 is issued.    But we urge caution in approaching the I-485 RFE response, especially when preparing any remaining RFE items – most often employment authorization and employment verification.

Maintaining Employment Authorization

In addition to asking for updated medicals, the RFE requests proof of employment authorization starting from the date the I-485 was filed until the present.   For many people this evidence would include copies of Employment Authorization Documents (EAD) or H-1B (or other employment-authorized status) approval notices/Form I-94 cards.   In many instances, I-485 applicants continue to maintain their H-1B status even after they file I-485 (and obtain EAD) or even after they switch an employer pursuant to AC21.    In other cases, I-485 applicants simply drop their H-1B and continue employment pursuant to a valid and uninterrupted EAD.

With this RFE, USCIS is trying to determine whether I-485 applicants may have been employed without authorization during the time the I-485 has been pending.   The significance is that in those cases where the I-485 applicant is deemed to have been employed without authorization (or without status) for more than 180 days since the last entry into the U.S., the government may deny the I-485 application under section 245(c).    Please see our article on this bar to adjustment and the section 245(k) defense.

As a result, special attention should be paid to ensuring that complete employment authorization history is provided.  If there are any gaps, we urge extreme caution.

Original Employment Verification Letter

The RFE also normally asks for an original employment verification letter (“EVL”) from the original (if no job change) or a new (if jobs changed pursuant to AC21) employer.   The EVL should be in original, on employer letterhead, and should confirm that the job offer described in the I-140 petition exists (for sponsoring employers).   In situations where the I-485 applicant has ported their I-485 to a new employer (or to the same employer but on a different position) pursuant to AC21, the RFE seeks an EVL from the new employer confirming that the new position is same or similar to the position noted in the I-140 petition.

As mentioned above, the EVL should be in original, currently-dated, describe the title and duties of the position, the salary, the minimum educational or training requirements, and the date the employment began (or will begin).

Attorney Assistance with Preparing RFE Response

Our office will be happy to provide consultations or assistance with responding to this (or other) kind of RFE.    If you would like to schedule a consultation with an attorney to discuss a specific case (but perhaps without engaging us to help with the RFE filing), we offer phone consultations.

We are also happy and available to assist with a more comprehensive RFE response representation.   Please feel free to complete this RFE inquiry form and we will be happy to provide thoughts and, if applicable, a quote for our legal assistance.

Conclusion

For many applicants, however, who may expect to see their priority become current over the next two to three months, responding to this kind of an RFE becomes very time-sensitive in order to have a complete case ready for approval once the priority date becomes current.

Please feel free to subscribe to our free weekly newsletter to obtain developments on this and related topics. If our office can be of any help, please feel free to contact us.

By | Last Updated: May 20th, 2017| Categories: AC21, AOS, Articles, I-485, News|

About the Author: Dimo Michailov

Dimo Michailov
Dimo has over 15 years of experience in US immigration including employment-based immigration benefits, corporate compliance and family based immigration. He represents corporate and individual clients in a wide range of cross-border immigration matters including mobility of key foreign executives and managers, specialized knowledge workers, and foreign nationals with extraordinary ability.

The Capitol Immigration Law Group has been serving the business community for over 15 years and is one of the most widely respected immigration law firms focused solely on U.S. employment-based immigration.   Disclaimer:  we make all efforts to provide timely and accurate information; however, the information in this article may become outdated or may not be applicable to a specific set of facts.  It is not to be construed as legal advice.