Thursday, June 17, 2010, 1:02 pm
Federal Lawsuit Challenges the January 2010 Neufeld Memo on Employer-Employee Relationship
June 17th, 2010 | Category: Articles, H-1B, News
We have written extensively in the past regarding the January 8, 2010 Neufeld Memo which introduced guidance requiring H-1B applications to show proof of employer-employee relationship between the H-1B petitioner and beneficiary. The Neufeld Memo has affected mostly staffing and consulting companies where the H-1B beneficiaries are employed at third-party worksites.
USCIS Sued to Prevent Enforcement of the Neufeld Memo Guidelines
In a five-count complaint filed by a coalition of staffing companies and representative trade associations, the USCIS is asked to stop temporarily and permanently from applying the Neufeld Memo in H-1B adjudications. The case is Broadgate v. USCIS and is assigned to Judge Kessler at the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
The complaint alleges that the Neufeld Memo abruptly altered long-standing agency policy which has permitted companies from placing H-1B workers at third-party job sites. The complaint further alleges that existing USCIS guidelines specify that an employer-employee relationship does exists when the petitioner company may “hire, pay, fire, supervise, or otherwise control the work of any such employee.” The plaintiffs in this case claim that the Neufeld Memo constitutes a legislative regulation because it sets forth new binding standards that prevent employers that place employees at third-party worksites, but which otherwise meet the regulatory definition, from sponsoring H-1B nonimmigrants.
The complaint alleges that the new policy (i) is contrary to existing law and regulations, (ii) is arbitrary and capricious because the government failed to articulate a policy justification, (iii) violates the Administrative Procedure Act notice-and-comment requirements, and (iv) should have been issued following a certification under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (which requires regulators to consider the potential impact of regulations on small business).
Conclusion: More to Follow
Our office has been very involved in this issue from the publication of the Neufeld Memo and we have seen the impact of the memo on H-1B adjudications and RFEs. USCIS has been under some pressure to amend the Neufeld Memo, at least in some respects, and this lawsuit is certain to put more pressure on resolving this controversy. We will continue monitoring this case and the Neufeld Memo developments coming out of USCIS and will provide updates. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact us or subscribe to our free weekly newsletter.
2010 H-1B Quota
Related Articles
Archives
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
Free Initial Consultation
Client Testimonials
April 27, 2010. I had the pleasure of being the client of attorney Michailov. I have found Mr. Michailov to be extremely professional, reliable and courteous. Mr. Michailov was always accessible and provided fast replies via email/skype to my many questions and timely updates on the correspondence received from USCIS. Overall, I am extremely satisfied with the quality of his service and will always recommend him.
» More client testimonials...
Tools
Check Your USCIS Case Status
Weekly Newsletter
Subscribe Now | Read Past Issues
Client Extranet
Client Login | About

